Legal Opinion
Search of Advanced Pain Centers Poplar Bluff v. Ware
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 31, 2014No. Case Nos. 4:13CV01408AGF, 1:13CV00107 AGFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*969 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge.
Petitioners Adbul Naushad, M.D. P.C., also known as Advanced Pain Centers (“APC”), and Billy Jo Ann Wilmert brought this action under Rule 411 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure against Respondents Timothy Ware and other unknown federal agents (“the Government”) seeking to exclude as evidence, or obtain the return of, certain seized documents and objects. This matter was originally filed as six separate civil actions. Petitioners styled their initial filing in each case as a “Motion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Kenneth Lee Baker Steven Robert Baker, Melissa Thomas v. General Motors Corporation, in Re: General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Margie P. Hollins v. Robert Lee PowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. YieldingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gillespie v. Charter CommunicationsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
- Johnson v. Air Liquide America L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019