Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Bruen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 15, 1850PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The petitioner, Duncan P. Campbell, claims to be a creditor of the deceased, and prays for an account, and payment of his demand. The executor, Herman Bruen, in his answer, denies any knowledge of the claim, and insisting upon full proof thereof in a Court of competent jurisdiction, excepts to the jurisdiction of the Surrogate. The answer also sets up in bar, the statute of limitations, and presumption of payment.

The deceased died in 1828, and letters testamentary were issued to George .W. Bruen, October 9, 1828. He was superseded as executor, October 28,1846, and letters were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. GardnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  2. Roberts v. Jackson, ex dem. WebbNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Gammell v. SkinnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1814
  4. Swift v. EckfordNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Churchill v. CraneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1842

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Buchan v. . RintoulNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Martine's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
  3. Greene v. DayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
  4. Tucker v. McDermottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876
  5. In re the Estate of UglowNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API