Legal Opinion

Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Gow

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Gow, 440 Mass. 1037 (2004), we denied without *1018prejudice the trustee’s request to reform the subject trusts because the record contained insufficient proof of the settlors’ intent. We noted that the trustee had failed to supply the court with materials identified in our order granting its applications for direct appellate review, and we noted other errors in the record and brief.3 The trustee has since supplemented the record with affidavits, and presently seeks the same relief requested previously. These cases are again before the court on the trustee’s applications…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. BankBoston v. MarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Fiduciary Trust Co. v. GowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Fleet National Bank v. MackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Fleet National Bank v. MarquisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Inderieden v. DownsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API