Legal Opinion

In re Cvammen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2004No. 2003-1366PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Applicant, Bradford Scott Cvammen of Akron, Ohio, filed an application on August 15, 2002, to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. On December 17, 2002, members of the Akron Bar Association Admissions Committee interviewed applicant as part of the review process to determine whether he possessed the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the Ohio bar. Gov.Bar R. I(11)(C) and (D). The interviewers recommended that applicant’s candidacy be disapproved temporarily because he had not fully and truthfully answered questions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Frenchtown Square Partnership v. Lemstone, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re PanepintoOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re BagneOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re AboyadeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re DabneyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Application of LibrettiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re Application of LibrettiOhio Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API