Legal Opinion

Ast v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1985No. Claim No. 64247PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

State Police urgently invoking the assistance of a Thruway toll collector to stop a fleeing vehicle owe a duty of due care to assure that compliance with their request does not expose the individual to a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm (see, Thain v City of New York, 35 AD2d 545, affd 30 NY2d 524; Schuster v City of New York, 5 NY2d 75, 81, 84; Lubelfeld v City of New York, 4 NY2d 455). The affirmed findings, supported by the record, that this duty was breached and that such breach was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Humphrey v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Thain v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Lubelfeld v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greene v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mohan v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API