Murphey v. Brewer
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepstoh
There is a motion to dismiss complainant’s appeal in this case based upon the following factual situation. The suit was filed by Mrs. Murphey against Brewer and three Coca Cola Bottling Companies. Some of the defendants demurred to the bill which demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed as to those defendants but not as to all defendants.
Gibson’s Suits in Chy., 4th ed., sec. 1265, states, “An appeal by the complainant will not lie, however, from a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer as to some of the defendants or overruling a plea in abatement, but it will lie on application of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Isreal v. GuyTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Hunter v. GardenhireTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Saunders v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Stephens & Johnson Operating Co. Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust CAH, Ltd.-MOPI for Capital Account CAH, Ltd.-Stivers Capital Account CAH, Ltd.-Wiegand Resources Capital Account Wiegand Resources C.T. Carden Myrl W. Deitch Trust E.R. Godbout Family Tru v. Charles W. Schroeder, Elsie A. Schroeder Schneider, Hollis London, Terry Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder Miller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder Stanfo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015