Legal Opinion

Eichholtz v. Martin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from, Labette District Court. Action by Eichholtz and others against D. H. Martin, as county clerk of Labette county, and others, to restrain the collection of certain taxes. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs bring the case here. The facts appear in the opinion herein, filed June 9, 1894.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

At the recent session of the legislature, an act was passed providing for the establishing and maintaining of a high school at Altamont, in Labette county. (Laws of 1893, ch. 140.) On April 10, 1893, the board of county commissioners of Labette county, in pursuance of the act, appointed trustees of such high school, who qualified and ever since have been acting as such trustees. On May 31, 1893, these trustees recommended to the board of county commissioners that a three-mill levy be made upon all the property in the county for the year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Midland Elevator Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Board of Com'rs v. Ætna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Rambo v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Rathbone v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API