Legal Opinion

Benafel v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1978No. WCB Case 76-6454, CA 9482PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant’s injury arose "out of and in the course of employment.” ORS 656.005(8)(a). We have recognized that cases such as this turn on their own peculiar facts and that reasoning by analogy to previous cases has little value. Casper v. SAIF, 13 Or App 464, 470, 511 P2d 451 (1973). We have identified the following factors helpful in determining the issue:

" ' "a) Whether the activity was for the benefit of the employer * * *;

" ' "b) Whether the activity was contemplated by the employer and employee either at the time of hiring or later *…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Casper v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Findley v. Time InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Compensation of Halfman v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Clark v. U. S. PlywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Halfman v. STATE ACC. INS. FUNDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API