Legal Opinion

VARGAS-BANUELOS

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1971No. 2109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2109 MATTER OF VARGAS-BANUELOS In Deportation Proceedings A-13532199 Decided by Board December 6, 1971 (1) Notwithstanding respondent did not accompany the illegal aliens into the United States, deportability is established under section 241 (a) (13), Immigration and Nationality Act, for aiding and abetting aliens to enter illegally, where, in scheming with the aliens in Mexico, he instructed them where to cross the border undetected, told them where to go upon reaching the United States, and arranged for an accomplice to drive respondent's truck to El Paso, Texas to meet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Alfredo Yanez-Jacquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. ALVAREZ-VERDUZCOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  4. CAUDILLO-VILLALOBOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1965
  5. Manuel Caudillo-Villalobos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. TIWARIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  4. Joao Pedro Porfirio Ribeiro v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Emma Altamirano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API