Legal Opinion
Steenmeyer v. Boeing Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 12, 2015No. Case No. C13-2184 MJPPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant The Boeing Company’s (“Boeing’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 21.) Having considered the Motion, Plaintiff Amy Steenmeyer’s Response (Dkt. No. 23), Boeing’s Reply (Dkt. No. 26), and all related papers, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion.
Background
Ms. Steenmeyer was hired into a permanent project manager position at Boeing in December 2011, after she had worked as a Boeing contractor for about six years. *1026(Oraze Dep., Dkt. No. 21-2, Ex. A at 47:15-20; see…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Larry Dawson v. Akal Security Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Bell v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Army Sustainment, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023
- Gallagher v. Hawaii Symphony OrchestraDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Kniffen v. East Wenatchee Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.