Liberato v. Liberato
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
The trial Court does not have jurisdiction of the cause for divorce unless it wholly arose or accrued while the plaintiff was domiciled in this State. R. L., c. 339, s. 5. In Greenlaw v. Greenlaw, 12 N. H. 200, the Court was of the opinion that a divorce could not be decreed under a statute that was not retrospective, for conviction and imprisonment that occurred prior to the enactment of the statute although the imprisonment continued beyond such passage. “At the time of its passage the libelee could not recall the one, nor avoid the continuance of the other; and a construction of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
- Rand v. RandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodruff v. WoodruffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Brady v. BradyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Perry v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972