Legal Opinion
People v. Cusimano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered March 7, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence was legally sufficient to support his conviction for robbery in the third degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant forcibly stole…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MonserrateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ShepardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015