Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dersch Energies, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company and Equilon Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 26, 2002No. 01-2495Published

1DissentCudahy, Circuit Judge

I

The question that remains after studying the opinion of the district court and that of the majority (which affirms the district court by applying a different analysis) is obvious: what possible purpose could Congress have had in amending the PMPA in 1994 to add § 2805(f)(1)? Although the district court set out to provide some sort of substance for this admittedly remedial piece of federal legislation, its efforts were, in the end, about as fruitless as those of the majority, which virtually writes § 2805(f)(1) out of the United States Code. The majority can only speculate that the section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Terry R. Beachler, Randall A. Greene, Wayne T. Neal v. Amoco Oil Company, Johnson Oil Company, and Smith Oil Company of KankakeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Pro Sales, Inc. v. Texaco, U.S.A., a Division of Texaco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API