Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 15, 1997Published

1Concurrence

HUMPHREYS, J.A.D.

(concurring).

I concur in the result substantially for the reasons in Judge Stern’s comprehensive opinion. I write separately to express my conviction that the Parole Board’s decision to deny parole to Thomas Trantino was the correct decision, correctly arrived at in accordance with law and due process. I disagree with my dissenting colleague’s view that the citizens who comprise the New Jersey State Parole Board have in “every adverse administrative decision” since 1990 violated their public duty and because of public outrage and political pressure, denied parole to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API