Legal Opinion

United States v. Ayala-Pizarro

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 23, 2008No. 16-2260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

By amendment, the United States Sentencing Commission lowered the offense levels associated with crack cocaine offenses. See USSG App. C, Amend. 706 (2007). The Commission thereafter issued a declaration of retroactivity with respect to those lowered offense levels. See USSG App. C, Amend. 713 (Supp. May 1, 2008). Focusing on Amendment 706, defendant-appellant Felipe Ayala-Pizarro moved for a reduction of his previously imposed sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 1 The district court found that it lacked authority to reduce the sentence, and Ayala-Pizarro appeals.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. CaraballoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. MateoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. CaraballoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. CardosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API