Legal Opinion
Barbour v. Pit Stop Imports, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1987No. 18700-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRED W. JONES, Jr., Judge.
Plaintiff sued to rescind the sale of an automobile because of redhibitory vices, Defendant’s motion for summary judg*15ment, asserting the car was sold without warranty, was sustained and plaintiffs suit dismissed. Plaintiff appealed the judgment. For the reasons hereinafter explained, we reverse and remand.
In his suit, the plaintiff Barbour alleged that on August 7, 1985 he bought a 1975 Mercedes automobile from defendant Pit Stop Imports, Inc. in Shreveport for $6000. He further asserted the car motor completely stopped while he was visiting in New Orleans on August…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chaisson v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Hemphill v. StrainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- LeBlanc v. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKenzie v. Webster Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Security Bank v. FrostLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988