Legal Opinion

Back v. First Solotwiner Sick Benefit Society

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

More than twenty days having elapsed after due entry of judgment and service of notice thereof, defendant was not entitled to an amendment or modification of judgment under section 129 of the Municipal Court Code. In addition the modification or amendment sought was not a correction for error of form or substance shown in the record itself. (Frost v. City of New York, 177 N. Y. Supp. 220.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petrides v. Park Hill Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943