Thigpen v. Mundine
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. Robert E. B. Baylor. This was a suit by John C. Mundine against Job Thigpen, on a promissory note for $504. The allegations of the petition, were as follows: “Your petitioner, John C. Mundine, sueing for the use of Ervin Brown, complains of Job Thigpen, (all of the parties being resident citizens of Washington county,) for this: that said Thigpen executed his note in writing, signed by himself, in substance as follows:” “ On…
Read the full summary
Error from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. Robert E. B. Baylor. This was a suit by John C. Mundine against Job Thigpen, on a promissory note for $504. The allegations of the petition, were as follows: “Your petitioner, John C. Mundine, sueing for the use of Ervin Brown, complains of Job Thigpen, (all of the parties being resident citizens of Washington county,) for this: that said Thigpen executed his note in writing, signed by himself, in substance as follows:” “ On the first day of January next, I promise to pay J. 0. Mundine, five hundred and four dollars, or bearer, for rent of…
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The petition states no cause of action. (Jennings v. Moss, 4 Texas Rep. 452; Frazier v. Todd, Id. 461; Malone v. Craig, and Lipscomb v. Bryan, 22 Texas Rep. 609.) The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Malone v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loungeway v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Colbertson v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Commercial Credit Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Missouri State Life Ins. v. RhyneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Rhyne v. Missouri State Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.