Legal Opinion

Sandal v. Tallman Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1979No. 48527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

This is an appeal by Judith A. Sandal from a Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmance of an order which determined that no further dependency benefits were payable on her claim. The claim had been accepted by the decedent Owen J. Sandal’s employer and insurer, 1 and pay ments had been made until Compensation Judge Joseph Murray ruled, upon approving attorneys fees, that the payments exceeded the maximum allowed under Minn.St. 176.-111, subd. 21 which applies to dependents who are also entitled to social security survivor benefits.

The employee’s widow urges that Judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Connolly Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Mechling v. Jasper Stone CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Dale v. Shaw Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Sandal v. TALLMAN OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lemke v. Knudsen Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Crepeau v. Krost Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Moeller v. Service Plumbing & HeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API