Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Tom Fullilove Construction Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2005No. 39,349-WCAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

|, PEATROSS, J.

Claimant Milburn Pierce appeals from a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”), holding that he must repay indemnity benefits paid by Defendant Tom Fullilove Construction Company (“Fullilove”). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

FACTS

Milburn Pierce is a painting contractor who operates Pierce Painting Company as a sole proprietorship. Mr. Pierce employed two painters and, in addition, did painting work himself. Mr. Pierce bought workers’ compensation insurance for his business through the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Corporation (“LWCC”). When he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. NAB Nat. Resources v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Robinson v. HeardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Rhodes v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. Flint v. Rockwood Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Manuel v. Jennings Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. FreyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API