Legal Opinion

In re: Stuart M. Starky and Cheryl M. Starky

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2014No. BAP AZ-14-1106-DJuKi; Bankruptcy 2:12-bk-22121-PSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Chapter 7 1 debtors Stuart and Cheryl Starky (“Debtors”) appeal the bankruptcy court’s order awarding reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to the chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”) after extended proceedings relating to the Debtors’ exemption claims, the protracted nature of which resulted in large part from the actions, or more appropriately, the inaction, of Debtors and their counsel. We perceive no abuse of discretion in the bankruptcy court’s award of fees and costs to Trustee’s counsel. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The relevant facts in this appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seror v. Lopez (In re Lopez)District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. In re: Robert Brower Sr.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API