Legal Opinion

Susoni de O'Neill v. Pacific Woodman Life Ass'n

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided April 23, 1940No. 7906Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tbayieso

The present action was commenced in May 1933, by a complaint filed by the widow and the mother of deceased Francisco 0 ’Neill, to recover the amount of a life insurance policy. It is alleged in the complaint that the policy in question was issued by the defendant £iin consideration of .the sum of $32 paid in advance and payable on December 15 of each year.” The defendant denied that the policy had been issued in consideration of the alleged payment of $32, or that such *525sum liad been paid, or, lastly, that the insurance contract was in force at the time of the death of deceased O’Neill. As…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berliner v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bankers' Reserve Life Co. v. SommersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Ginners' Mut. Underwriters Ass'n v. PickardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API