Susoni de O'Neill v. Pacific Woodman Life Ass'n
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tbayieso
The present action was commenced in May 1933, by a complaint filed by the widow and the mother of deceased Francisco 0 ’Neill, to recover the amount of a life insurance policy. It is alleged in the complaint that the policy in question was issued by the defendant £iin consideration of .the sum of $32 paid in advance and payable on December 15 of each year.” The defendant denied that the policy had been issued in consideration of the alleged payment of $32, or that such *525sum liad been paid, or, lastly, that the insurance contract was in force at the time of the death of deceased O’Neill. As…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berliner v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Bankers' Reserve Life Co. v. SommersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ginners' Mut. Underwriters Ass'n v. PickardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930