Legal Opinion

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers & Its Locals 656 & 985 v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1983No. 81-1377PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Defendants, Greyhound Lines, Inc. appeal from a district court judgment enforcing an arbitration award which required them to implement certain benefit increases in the employees’ pension and benefit fund. Greyhound seeks to have the lower court’s judgment vacated upon its contention that the arbitrator is a fiduciary under the Employees’ Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and that, as such, he acted unlawfully because he failed to satisfy the bonding requirements under the Act. Since we conclude that ERISA was not intended to subject arbitrators…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Doe v. McFaulDistrict Court, D. Ohio · 1984
  3. Ozark Air Lines, Inc. And Thomas J. Korte v. National Mediation Board and the Air Line Pilots' Association International and Arthur J. Schenk, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. White v. GerbitzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Conner v. GreefCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API