United States v. Lutwak. United States v. Knoll. United States v. Treitler

On Petition for Rehearing.

The statements contained in the last three lines of the second paragraph of appellants’ petition for rehearing, beginning with the words “In ignoring * * * ” and the footnote 1 on the same page, together with the general tenor of the petition, might well justify striking the entire document for inexcusable impertinence and irrelevance. Clearly the matter mentioned in those two excerpts is in no way related to the facts or the law of'this case. What the court may have done in matters involving other issues of fact and other principles of law, foreign to anything…