Legal Opinion

Pantaleoni v. City of Rome

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

Movants seek permission to serve a late notice of claim against the City of Rome (City). The claims are founded upon alleged violations of plaintiffs’ constitutional and statutory rights (42 USC § 1983) by City personnel, associated with the City jail, following plaintiffs’ arrest by the Oneida County Sheriff’s Department.

The arrest, incarceration and subsequent release from custody all took place on June 4, 1984. This date commences the 90-day period within which the notice of claim must be filed. The City claims that the period expired on September 1,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scuderi v. Board of Education for City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Fay v. BoylandNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Claim of Aposporos v. City of PoughkeepsieNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Phillips v. Village of FrankfortNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Farber v. Besi Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Ross v. DHCRAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. M.G. v. Rye City School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API