Legal Opinion

Corning Tunnel Co. v. Pell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Per curiam

This motion rests upon the single proposition that no appeal lies from a judgment of nonsuit.

At common law a judgment of nonsuit was not reviewable for the obvious reason that it was founded on the assent of the plaintiff. An involuntary nonsuit was unknown to the common law. Under our practice, the right of court to non-suit a plaintiff, where the evidence produced is not sufficient to sustain a verdict, is expressly declared by statute. 9 Sess. Laws, p. 99.

A judgment of nonsuit rendered by the court in the exercise of this power is, as to the defendant, in invitum; is a complete disposition…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colorado Eastern Ry. Co. v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. County Court of Denver v. Eagle Book Gold Mining & Reduction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API