Briggs-Darby Construction Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*143OPINION.
ARNOLD:
In these proceedings R. W. Briggs & Co. exchanged certain depreciable assets for all the capital stock of each of the petitioners, pursuant to certain contracts with four of its superintendents. The depreciable assets had been valued by the contracting parties prior to their exchange for capital stock as having a value in excess of their depreciated value upon the books of R. W. Briggs & Co. The petitioners deducted depreciation based upon this increased valuation. This deduction respondent denied, but permitted a deduction for depreciation upon the same basis as such assets…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Helvering v. BashfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guilford v. MulkinNew York Supreme Court · 1895