Legal Opinion
Kane v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 29, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority appeals, by permission, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated May 8, *10412006, as, upon granting its motion for a mistrial, directed it to pay the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $50,000, and, sua sponte, directed it to produce its expert witnesses for depositions and to produce certain expert and laboratory reports, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the order as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Post v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Riley v. ISS International Service System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Telemark Construction Inc. v. Francis Fleetwood & AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- 232 Broadway Corp. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Degliuomini v. DegliuominiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivers v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Badillo v. BadilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- DeSilvo v. ZhengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Rivers v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012