Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Bobak & AIG Claims Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Respondents appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. We previously held this case, reserved decision and remitted the matter to Supreme Court for a determination, after a framed-issue hearing, whether the third-party vehicle at issue was covered by any other insurance that would negate the supplemental uninsured/underinsured motorist (SUM) coverage afforded by the policy issued by respondent New Hampshire Insurance Company (NHIC) (Matter of Bobak [AIG Claims Servs., Inc.], 72 AD3d 1651 [2010]). We also reversed the order in a related appeal that denied NHIC’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Levi v. LeviAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Mangano v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Arbitration between New Hampshire Insurance & BobakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Dioguardi v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API