Legal Opinion

Old Colony Trust Co. v. Shackford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The petitioner has in its hands as trustee under the seventh paragraph of the will of Rutha E. Shackford a substantial fund, for the distribution of which it has obtained a decree of the Probate Court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 203, § 25.

As no facts are reported, there is nothing to show that the decree is wrong. However, all parties state in their briefs, either expressly or by necessary inference, that the persons named as distributees in the decree are the heirs at law of the testatrix and the administratrix of a deceased heir, and that the appellants are the administrator of the estate of Lila…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelley v. MeinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Minot v. PurringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Damrell v. HarttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Hayward v. RoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fiduciary Trust Co. v. MishouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Morris v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Hayes v. HammondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API