Nall v. Estate of Powell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*412The complaint is untimely under the four-year California statute of limitations governing contract actions (see CPLR 202). Plaintiff Nall is a California resident, and the economic impact of her claimed injury was sustained in that state (see Global Fin. Corp. v Triarc Corp., 93 NY2d 525 [1999]). Nall’s attempt to carve out a real estate transfer exception to the general rule articulated in Global Fin. Corp. is unpersuasive. Plaintiffs contend that the parties had a reasonable time to close after the scheduled December 31, 2004 closing date set forth in their term sheet agreement because the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Global Financial Corp. v. Triarc Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Thompson v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pitcock v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Nova v. Jerome Cluster 3, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Naval v. American Arbitration Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.