Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1918No. 4919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant, appeals from a final judgment, against him as a surety in a scire facias ease on what was claimed to be a bail bond.

He points out many defects of this bond and conflicts therein which he claims are fatal to prevent any valid judgment thereon against him.. It is unnecessary to even state all of these.

It is difficult to conceive of more mistakes and conflicts in a bail bond than were made in this one. However, it is only necessary to-state one.

The law prior to the Act of 1899, page 111, which amended article-321, Code of Criminal Procedure, prescribed as one of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1920
  2. Rheiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API