Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi Cement Corporation v. Cir

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2020No. 19-71401Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION No. 19-71401 & SUBSIDIARIES, A Delaware Corporation, Tax Ct. No. 7161-16 Petitioner-Appellant, MEMORANDUM* v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court Argued and Submitted October 8, 2020 Seattle, Washington Before: GILMAN,** CALLAHAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Mitsubishi Cement Corporation & Subsidiaries (“Mitsubishi”) appeals the decision of the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Southwestern Portland Cement Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. R. A. Riddell, District Director, Internal Revenue, Los Angeles District v. California Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Boyd Gaming Corporation, F.K.A. The Boyd Group and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, California Hotel & Casino and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API