Legal Opinion
Welch v. Workman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2010No. 07-5061PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADDRESSING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUBSTITUTING NEW OPINION
Appellant, Gary Roland Welch, petitioned for panel and en banc rehearing.
Panel rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of addressing the issue Welch raised in his petition for panel rehearing and clarifying that the panel reviewed the Hardcastle family’s victim impact testimony de novo, applying Brecht v. Abraham-son, 507 U.S. 619, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). The panel’s original opinion will be amended to do so. The opinion in this case dated June 07, 2010, Welch v. Workman, 607 F.3d 674 (10th Cir.2010), is…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Byrd v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Banks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Hanson v. SherrodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.