Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works
Supreme Court of the United States
PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ÍN each of these cases, the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District .of California, upon a bill in equity for the.infringement of a patent for an invention, an answer denying the validity and the infringement of the patent, a general replication and a hearing, entered an interlocutory decree, adjudging that the patent was valid and had been infringed, granting an injunction,…
Read the full summary
PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ÍN each of these cases, the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District .of California, upon a bill in equity for the.infringement of a patent for an invention, an answer denying the validity and the infringement of the patent, a general replication and a hearing, entered an interlocutory decree, adjudging that the patent was valid and had been infringed, granting an injunction, and referring the case to a master to take an account of profits- and damages. From that decree, in each case, the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
The act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, establishing Circuit Courts of Appeals, after providing in section 5, for appeals from the Circuit Courts and District Courts directly to this'court in *520certain classes of cases; and, in section 6, for appeals from final decisions of those courts to the Circuit Court of Appeals in all other cases, including cases arising under the patent laws; further provides, in section 7, that “ where, upon a hearing in equity in a District Court, or in an existing Circuit Court, an injunction shall be granted or continued by an interlocutory order or decree, in a cause in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Philadelphia Rubber Works Co. v. U. S. Rubber Reclaiming WorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Australian Knitting Co. v. GormlyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905
- Tornanses v. MelsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Butler v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.