Hayes v. Bickelhoupt

This cause has been before hoard and considered. Hayes v. Bickelhoupt, 21 Fed. Rep. 567. A rehearing has been granted and had as to the second claim of reissue 8,675, the second and third claims of 8,688, and the second and third claims of 8,689, on account of mistake of models of patent for those relied upon to show infringement, and of error in reference to former decisions upon the same patents. It was said by Judge Benedict, in Hayes v. Seton, 12 Fed. Rep. 120, that the second claim of 8,675 appeared to be for the same invention described in the original patent. He states no comparison of…