Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Volkman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2013No. 19-5187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

When a doctor first enters the practice of medicine, he or she swears to abide by a prime directive of the profession: “First, do no harm.” Paul Volkman breached this sacrosanct tenet when he prescribed narcotics to addicts and individuals with physical, mental, and psychological frailties. A federal jury looked at Volkman’s actions and found him guilty of breaking several laws, chief among them the law prohibiting the unlawful distribution of controlled substances. After receiving the jury’s verdict, the district court sentenced Volkman to four…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul VolkmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Jason GuidryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Volkman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. BinderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Eil v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API