Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Letkowski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 1, 2013No. 11-P-928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.

After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping, armed robbery, aggravated rape,1 assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon (a belt), and witness intimidation. He appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence and a postarrest statement. He also argues that (1) his conviction should be reversed because the prosecutor improperly used his exercise of Miranda rights against him; (2) the erroneous admission of first complaint evidence created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice; (3) the admission of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. State v. PauldoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. Commonwealth v. LetkowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API