Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1999No. 96-56808PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
This is a Constitutional challenge to random urine tests for bus dispatchers and instructors.
Facts.
This case was dismissed with prejudice on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, so we evaluate the complaint de novo to decide whether it states a claim upon which relief could be granted, if the facts alleged were proved. Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc. v. United States Forest Service, 92 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.1996). The constitutionality of agency drug testing regulations is reviewed de novo. International Bhd. of Teamsters v. Department of Transp., 932 F.2d 1292, 1298 (9th Cir.1991).
Accor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Western Conference of Teamsters v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Bruce Lavine, as Next Friend of James Lavine James Lavine v. Blaine School District, a Municipal Corporation Tim Haney Dan Newell Karen MulhollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Burton v. State, Department of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- Burton v. State, Department of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010