Legal Opinion

Smith v. Snider

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 13, 1969No. 5-5035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee on account of a back injury allegedly sustained by Mm wMle assisting in moving a pump bouse on appellee’s farm. Appellee moved for a directed verdict upon the ground that appellant had failed to show actionable negligence and had shown by Ms own testimony that he had assumed the risk involved. The trial judge granted tMs motion, finding that appellant assumed whatever risk was involved and dismissed the complaint. Appellant objected upon the ground that he could not be charged with having assumed the risk because he was without knowledge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Luten Bridge Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. Service MacHine CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1971
  2. Burks Motors, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Sanders v. WheatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Burks Motors, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Hickory Heights Health & Rehab, LLC v. Yashika WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API