Legal Opinion

K-2, INC. v. Fresh Coat, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 17, 2008No. 09-06-251 CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

The trial court signed a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of Fresh Coat, Inc. against K-2, Inc. (a/k/a Finestone) under the Products Liability Act. See Tex. Crv. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 82.001-008 (Vernon 2005 & Supp.2007). A builder, Life Forms Homes, Inc., had contracted with Fresh Coat for Fresh Coat’s installation of Finestone’s synthetic stucco cladding (EIFS) 1 on houses. The homeowners complained of water penetration in the EIFS that led to “excessively high moisture levels in the cladding and structural damage from rot and termite infestation.”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fresh Coat, Inc. v. K-2, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Centerpoint Builders Gp, LLC and Centerpoint Builders, Ltd. v. Trussway, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Centerpoint Builders Gp, LLC and Centerpoint Builders, Ltd. v. Trussway, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API