Legal Opinion

Alexander & Co. v. Goldstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1900No. Appeal, No. 104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 104, April T., 1900, by defendant, in a suit of Alexander & Co. against H. Goldstein,, from decree of C. P. Washington Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 138. refusing exceptions to the record of an alderman and confirming his judgment. Per Curiam. Certiorari to judgment of an alderman.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 104, April T., 1900, by defendant, in a suit of Alexander & Co. against H. Goldstein,, from decree of C. P. Washington Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 138. refusing exceptions to the record of an alderman and confirming his judgment. Per Curiam. Certiorari to judgment of an alderman. It appears from the record that a certiorari was directed to John Holland, alderman, for the purpose of determining the validity of a judgment and execution under which defendant was arrested and delivered into the custody of the sheriff of Washington county. Other essential facts sufficiently appear in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Section 4 of the Act of March 22, 1814, 6 Sm. L. 182, conferring upon justices of the peace jurisdiction of actions of trover .and conversion and of actions of trespass provides, that the “ process, return thereof, notices, awards, judgments and appeals, and the proceedings of justices, constables, referees and courts, and every proceeding necessary to carry this act into effect, which is not herein specially provided for, shall be made and -done, under and according to the provisions and regulations in similar cases contained ” hi the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 161.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Johnson v. BettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. Strouse v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Allegheny County v. DavisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Pennsylvania Pulp & Paper Co. v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paulson v. EisenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Meyer v. DohertyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. FIGUEROA v. POINT PARK UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API