Legal Opinion

People v. Parker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 2014No. E057890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MILLER, J.

In 2000, defendant and appellant Wenonah Karen Parker was found guilty, but not guilty by reason of insanity, of various crimes. (Pen. Code, § 1026.) Defendant was committed to Patton State Hospital (Patton). In 2011, the trial court granted defendant outpatient status. (§ 1026.2.) The outpatient agencies refused to accept defendant due to her behavior and mental condition. As a result, defendant remained hospitalized at Patton, in the inpatient program. In 2012, the trial court revoked the order granting defendant outpatient status. (§ 1608.)

Defendant raises three issues on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anne H. v. Michael B.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. Stockman CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API