Legal Opinion

Smith v. State ex rel. Hamill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1894No. 17,116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

— The appellee filed in this court a.petition to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason following, to wit:

“Because of the failure of appellants to comply with rule 31 of this court, in this, to wit: That no marginal notes are placed on the transcript, in their appropriate places, indicating the pleadings, exhibits, orders of the court, bills of exceptions, and names of witnesses; nor are there any marginal notes of motions, and rulings of the court.’’

Rule 31 of this court is as follows:

“XXXI. The appellant shall cause the transcript to be paged and the lines of each page to be numbered. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Whitaker v. LankfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API