Legal Opinion
Smith v. State ex rel. Hamill
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1894No. 17,116PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
— The appellee filed in this court a.petition to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason following, to wit:
“Because of the failure of appellants to comply with rule 31 of this court, in this, to wit: That no marginal notes are placed on the transcript, in their appropriate places, indicating the pleadings, exhibits, orders of the court, bills of exceptions, and names of witnesses; nor are there any marginal notes of motions, and rulings of the court.’’
Rule 31 of this court is as follows:
“XXXI. The appellant shall cause the transcript to be paged and the lines of each page to be numbered. He…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- State ex rel. Whitaker v. LankfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. DammIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.