Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Leidos, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 27, 2015No. 2:14-cv-02247-GEB-KJNPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S DISMISSAL MOTION UNDER RULES 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6)

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.

Defendant moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) for dismissal of Plaintiffs putative class action, arguing under Rule 12(b)(1): “Plaintiff lacks Article III standing [to pursue his claims] because he has not alleged a cognizable injury[ ] in[ ] fact traceable to any action by [Defendant], and the Court therefore lacks subject matter jurisdiction.” (Def.’s Mem. P. & A. Supp. Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.”) 2:9-10, ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Welborn v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Blood v. Labette County Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  3. Doe v. Northern CA Fertility Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. In re IMA Financial Group Data Security Incident LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  5. Jenkins v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API