Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1989No. S89A0231, S89X0249Published

1Opinion of the Court

259 Ga. 643 (1989)

385 S.E.2d 408

DIXON et al.

v.

MURPHY; and vice versa.

S89A0231, S89X0249.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided November 22, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied December 5, 1989.

Brown & Romeo, H. Eugene Brown, Robert T. Romeo, for appellants.

Emory B. Bazemore, for appellee.

WELTNER, Justice.

Dixon conveyed twelve acres of land to Chapman. Chapman obtained a loan on the property, and later conveyed the land to Murphy. Dixon and Murphy assumed Chapman's loan and paid it.

It was at that point that Dixon and Murphy — who are mother and son — fell out. Dixon claims that the land was to be reconveyed…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. McDaniel v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Sewell v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API