Legal Opinion
Sentence Review Panel v. Moseley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 7, 2008No. S08A0607Published
1Opinion of the Court
663 S.E.2d 679 (2008)
SENTENCE REVIEW PANEL et al.
v.
MOSELEY.
No. S08A0607.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
July 7, 2008.
Gray, Hedrick & Edenfield, LLP, Bruce M. Edenfield, Susan Lee Rutherford, Atlanta, Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joseph J. Drolet, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, J. Brown Moseley, Albany, pro se.
Gerald Richard Weber, Jr., Sarah E. Geraghty, Kilpatrick Stockton, Curtis Allen Garrett, Jr., Hayley R. Ambler, Atlanta, Patrick H. Head, Dist. Atty., Dana J. Norman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for amicus curiae.
CARLEY,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.