Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Txn. of the Salaries of Judges

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To Thos. S. Kenan, Clerk of the Supreme Court.

Dear Sir: — I herewith, hand you the correspondence between Attorney-General Gilmer and myself with regard to the right of the-Legislature to tax the salaries of the Judges. And in doing so I wish to say that it is a full,. able and, indeed, an exhaustive discussion of the subject involved, and in my opinion a correct decision of the question.

It has been read to the Court sitting in conference and approved without a dissenting voice. It was then ordered by the Court that the Attorney-General’s opinion, together with my letter to him and this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Carpenter v. SnellingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Craig v. DimockIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Davis v. Richardson & MayMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Jones v. Estate of KeepWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Long v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Gordy v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Purnell v. Page.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Wickham v. NygaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Long v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API