Legal Opinion
Mary Brazil v. Arkansas Dept of Human Service
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 12, 2018No. 17-2229PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRAS, Circuit Judge.
Mary Brazil alleges that her supervisors at the Arkansas Department of Human Services retaliated against her for filing a civil-rights lawsuit. With her retaliation claim pending, Brazil changed jobs and is now free of the conditions that caused her to sue. Because all that remains is a speculative possibility that Brazil will face further retaliation, we vacate the district court's judgment, remand the case, and *959 instruct the district court to dismiss her retaliation claim due to a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
I
Mary Brazil has spent over three decades working for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Ashcroft v. MattisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ahmed Hassan Ali, Also Known as Ahmed Warsame v. Mark Cangemi, Interim Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Zach Hillesheim v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Charles Sisney v. Denny KaemingkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Scott Rivera v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Aaron Dalton v. JJSC Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Little Rock Fam. Planning Svcs v. Leslie RutledgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.