Legal Opinion
Catherine v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01487Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD CATHERINE, No. 2:19-cv-1487 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Donald Catherine is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 19 3, 2020, the undersigned issued an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting 20 plaintiff further leave to amend. (ECF No. 14.) Instead of filing an amended…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.